|
Post by Davon on Jun 4, 2008 19:43:35 GMT -5
Im posting this here since no one ever looks in suggestion board. I personally think owners should have a system to agreeing on things and making changes for the league. For example team owners and co owners have to both agree on making trades and cuts and signs. I think it should be the same for the CFA owners as well to avoid this situation that is preasent. Also impeachment rules.
|
|
|
Post by Marco on Jun 4, 2008 19:48:21 GMT -5
empeachment is a good idea incase anyone ever got out of control. we did have a system, never ran into trouble until the past few days
|
|
|
Post by Davon on Jun 4, 2008 20:01:49 GMT -5
what system? This league has never been informed on what that sytem was so we can be aware.
|
|
|
Post by Marco on Jun 4, 2008 20:12:47 GMT -5
ummm we come up with an idea, we tell other 2 owners, either all agree on that idea or we come up with somthin else
|
|
|
Post by Bulldogs28 on Jun 4, 2008 20:21:00 GMT -5
yea its supposed 2 be all 3 owners have to agree on major decisions, but joe n marco been claiming flag never been on so they felt that they didnt need his consent
|
|
|
Post by Davon on Jun 4, 2008 20:24:46 GMT -5
pretty weak system
|
|
|
Post by Bulldogs28 on Jun 4, 2008 20:26:07 GMT -5
well when they actually obey the system i dont see anything wrong with it, its not like cy and yello are owners who cant agree on anything...plus now that were adding a board it should also help balance the owning
|
|
|
Post by Yello- 3 sacks 2 blocks 10 TDs on Jun 4, 2008 20:28:09 GMT -5
I suggest an impeach
My idea:
Me since im not on team be the rodger goodell
Then have a 6 person board
if the votes are tied since im not biast ill make the 7th vote.
Apparantly xl is working on a board alone (picking anyone who sucks up) so its the same thing more people from 1 side in power....
|
|
|
Post by Marco on Jun 4, 2008 20:30:03 GMT -5
again, thanks but no thanks yello.
|
|
|
Post by Yello- 3 sacks 2 blocks 10 TDs on Jun 4, 2008 20:31:19 GMT -5
flag this is why many people dont like your decisions and go agaist you.... You said no not anybody else.
|
|
|
Post by Marco on Jun 4, 2008 20:34:27 GMT -5
umm no, im just sayin no to u. xl's got the board under control
|
|
|
Post by Yello- 3 sacks 2 blocks 10 TDs on Jun 4, 2008 20:35:36 GMT -5
key word there is XL not CFA as a whole. Thats the problem....
|
|
|
Post by Marco on Jun 4, 2008 20:41:51 GMT -5
xl is getting a board together to represent the CFA as a whole. how do you have any more right to represent the CFA as a whole than he does?
|
|
|
Post by Yello- 3 sacks 2 blocks 10 TDs on Jun 4, 2008 20:43:48 GMT -5
did i say me represent them as a whole? i said we vote.. As in everyone in CFA has a write in vote
|
|
|
Post by Davon on Jun 4, 2008 20:45:46 GMT -5
Perfect example of republican v.s. democrat
|
|